When my the local police and EMS folks attempt to track missing kids via phones, the ping rate is directly proportional to app activity. Yes, we can get a ping even if the battery is dead, but we get wildly more and more frequent pings when the kid is surfing the internet. Folks using GPS guidance or TikTok or whathave you with wifi in a store are simply more visible to the tracking services than folks in a masonry cathedral with the phone on silent. \n”,”children”:[<"id":160745018,"author":"Student","vote_total":0,"user_vote":null,"updoots":0,"downboops":0,"vote_count":0,"date":"2024-04-16>
A definition of weekly could be attendance on any day of the week in the survey\u2026 even if they missed the Sunday service (which is a day of obligation). \n”>,<"id":160744829,"author":"Student","vote_total":0,"user_vote":null,"updoots":1,"downboops":1,"vote_count":2,"date":"2024-04-16>
Less than 1 in 5 turning their phone off, putting it in airplane mode, or leaving it home is plausible. At Catholic services, the specifically ask people to do that. 3\/5 ignoring that request but putting it on silent mode and 1\/5 leaving it on with the ringer on sounds about right in my anecdotal experience. \n”>],”childrenIDs”:[160744876,160745018,160744831,160744829]>,<"id":160744800,"author":"Dave>
So it is your contention that 17% of people in the US go to church and leave their phone off or at home? That is an incredible assertion. You’d think that many phones off would show up in the data. (In my church, we text prayer requests, have digital bulletins, etc. so many have their phones on.) \n”,”children”:[<"id":160744871,"author":"Sure","vote_total":5,"user_vote":null,"updoots":5,"downboops":0,"vote_count":5,"date":"2024-04-16>
No, We insist that if you are going to number pings in order to size location volume you ought to account for things that transform ping rates. Things such as: clinical turning off\/faster application utilize during the properties, making the device home, reduced cellular phone reception into the largescale masonry, dual-goal locations where dont meets his coding (age.grams. good Pentecostal church meeting within the a personal home, a dwindling church you to marketed the strengthening now suits into the a senior heart), and you will attendance beyond your \”antique day Scottish kvinnelige personer of praise\”. \letter
His personal analysis, when featured against most useful study present, reveals quite towards adaptation. Motion picture going is actually undercounted by 29% relative to gate matter. Basketball games tend to be most useful counted than basketball video game. More their entire manage mix he suggests
I take advantage of geolocation investigation away from Veraset, a pals giving\nde-identified geospatial data getting scores of U
90% internet error assortment. As well as those ideas is very much more like for every single other than churchgoing. And when i use his extremely lax dimensions requirement, next literally all ‘never-browsing atheist’ must be lying. \letter
The larger trouble with the definition to own Catholics that\u2019s used would be the fact people attend Weekend solution for the Monday night vigil size (which was typically the start of Sunday)
Maybe you should tell me one to rather than the questionnaire mentioned step 1\/4 or 1\/5, real weekly attendance speed was step 1\/six otherwise step one\/8. That is probable. But when you have to let me know it is step 1\/20 otherwise 1\/twenty-five, i quickly provides a lot of guys providing widowmakers within church. \n
Most likely his data, which already has some truly bizarre implications (like the afore referenced 100% yearly-attending rate), and an overall correlation of 0.4 is simply systematically inaccurate at measuring weekly attendance. \n”>],”childrenIDs”:>,<"id":160744685,"author":"RAD","vote_total":20,"user_vote":null,"updoots":24,"downboops":4,"vote_count":28,"date":"2024-04-16>
Overall, I think the 2.1M sample is a fairly conservative cut of the data and represents situations where phones are being tracked nearly continuously. However, for robustness, I run and report in Section IV several robustness checks using different and much tighter sample restrictions (both in terms of days with a visit and average hours during the day) and find nearly identical results. \n”,”children”:[<"id":160744755,"author":"Tom>
Shopping for cellular phone sample. S. sple period, the firm features a unique mobile phone ID having tens from many out-of cell phones (